Dear DPARSF A Experts:
Thank you for this valuable toolbox.
I have successfully pre-processed my data (20 healthy controls; 20 patients) using DPARSF A for a voxel-wise functional connectivity analysis with a pre-defined ROI. I had two resting state runs for each of my 40 subjects, so my data is organized as required by DPARSF into a folder named 'Analysis' under which I created two FunImg folders (FunImg, and S2_FunImg) for both resting-state runs. Therefore, I have now 2 Results folders that contain the zFCMaps for each person.
I am uncertain what toolbox to use to view the functional connectivity of all (40 subjects) with the ROI and how to input my subject data when I have two zFCmaps for each person?
I also want to perform an analysis on whether or not there are group differences in functional connectivity between the ROI and the rest of the brain (two-tailed t-test?). My question is how do I organize this data and what toolbox do I use to perform this type of analysis?
Very Best Regards,
Cat Chong
Hi Cat,
Hi Cat,
You can use DPABI (http://rfmri.org) Viewer to view the functional connectivity maps (see Part I in http://rfmri.org/Course).
Usually, you will do a statistical analysis (one-sample t-test, with DPABI Statistical Analysis) to view the general pattern.
As you have two sessions, a common processing is simple averaging FC maps over the two sessions for each subject.
To test group differences, you can use Two-Sample Two-Tailed t-test. You can use DPABI Statistical Analysis module to do that. Please find the operational details at http://rfmri.org/Course.
Best,
Chao-Gan
Re: [RFMRI] group analysis
On Jan 14, 2015, at 3:23 PM, The R-fMRI Network <rfmri.org@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Cat,
Hi Cat,
I will suggest you to try DPABI->Utilities->Image Calculator,
use the expression (g1+g2)/2
g1, g2 is your functinoal connectivity directories.
Best,
Chao-Gan
Re: [RFMRI] group analysis
On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:44 PM, The R-fMRI Network <rfmri.org@gmail.com> wrote:
degrees of freedom
Hi Dr. Yan,
Would averaging runs in this way reduce degrees of freedom for the group-level stats?
Thank you,
Felix