about ReHo

Submitted by fMRInovice on

Dear experts,

I am a novice in fMRI. I would like to ask a question about  the preprocessing of ReHo. Is it necessary to include "nuisance regression" in the preprocessing step? In some literatures it was not mentioned, while in some others it was included. Is "nuisance regression" necessary?

Thank you for your kind reply!

Charlotte.

Xi-Nian Zuo

Wed, 02/18/2015 - 05:30

Permalink

Charlotte -- Yeap. My recommendation is to get ride of these nuisances (not including global signal). Please read recent reliability review (Zuo et al., 2013; Zuo and Xing, 2014). Cheers, Xi-Nian. > -----Original Messages----- > From:"The R-fMRI Network" > Sent Time:Wednesday, February 18, 2015 > To:rfmri.org@rnet.co > Cc: > Subject:[RFMRI] about ReHo > > > > [To post a comment, please reply to rfmri.org@gmail.comABOVE this line] > > By Jiechuan Ren (fMRInovice) > > Dear experts, > I am a novice in fMRI. I would like to ask a question about  the preprocessing of ReHo. Is it necessary to include "nuisance regression" in the preprocessing step? In some literatures it was not mentioned, while in some others it was included. Is "nuisance regression" necessary? > Thank you for your kind reply! > Charlotte. > Online version of this post: http://rfmri.org/content/about-reho-0 > > > Many a little makes a mickle -- your kind contributions shall make our efforts not perish from the earth. Please help The R-fMRI Network at http://rfmri.org/#overlay=HelpUs > To manage subscriptions, please visit: http://rnet.co/mailman/listinfo/rfmri.org_rnet.co > Mail comment ID: http://rfmri.org/mailcomment/redirect/%3C31.1950.0.1424234382.623e0517994f5a655650b460a3fa48da%40www.rfmri.org%3E
Forums
Discuss (controversial) issues